CATEGORIES

ARCHIVES

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

October 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005


XML FEEDS

Atom

RSS

CONTACT

Send suggestions to:

blog@housing.com

RSS Feed
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to MyMSN
Subscribe at NewsGator Online

Links

Architecture
Archinect
FabPreFab
Land + Living

Bubble Blogs
Marin Real Estate Bubble Blog
The Housing Bubble Blog
Bubble Meter
The Boy In The Housing Bubble
New Jersey Real Estate Bubble
Design
Design Public
NY Times House & Home
Green
Alternative Fuel Watch
TreeHugger
Green Links
Real Estate
Apartment Therapy
Curbed
Inman News
MSNBC Real Estate
NY Times Real Estate
Mortgage & Finance
Bankrate Blog
CNN Money
Other
AskMetaFilter
Getting Things Done


Powered by
Movable Type 3.2

Sunday Housing News


The Real Estate Journal has a really cool anatomy of a real estate investment from the 28th. This is the kind of thing we need to see more of--nuts and bolts, in-depth calculations of exactly what it will take to make a profit off investing in property. I particularly like this one because it illustrates both the downers and uppers of the modern market.

Downer: His main reason for trying to sell the property, Mr. Klein says, is that the interest rate on his mortgage eats into his profit... His mortgage rate might increase in late December 2007 -- to 13%. Even if he raises the rents, he might not be able to make an operating profit on the property.

Upper: Mr. Klein does not anticipate paying listing fees, as he is marketing the home as for sale by owner.

I can't stress enough how important that "upper" is...Klein is potentially saving himself a good chunk of change simply by applying his own hard-earned knowledge (including the mistake of using an ARM) and bypassing the realtor protection racket.

Actually, there's an interesting debate going on over at Inman's blog about the virtues and vices of an open MLS system. Money quote:

Consumers have options now. This open MLS is like doing a ballor initiutive to have Mercedes build a $9800 car. If you want one buy a KIA. If you want FSBO go to one of the thousands of FSBO sites. If you want to be on the MLS pay for it. This is not negative, this is commerce.

That's really the key right there. The data has to be accurate, and MLS sites still have the stranglehold in terms of most accurate valuations. Having FSBO, discount lender, and other such listing services nip at their heels works more from a transparency and openness perspective than it does accuracy...for now, anyway. But the best of all three is the way to go. This seems to be the model that Zillow is favoring, and it's certainly one we here at Housing support.

Posted at July 30, 2006 05:28 PM

digg this story

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://weblog.housing.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/210


Go back