CATEGORIES

ARCHIVES

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

October 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005


XML FEEDS

Atom

RSS

CONTACT

Send suggestions to:

blog@housing.com

RSS Feed
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to MyMSN
Subscribe at NewsGator Online

Links

Architecture
Archinect
FabPreFab
Land + Living

Bubble Blogs
Marin Real Estate Bubble Blog
The Housing Bubble Blog
Bubble Meter
The Boy In The Housing Bubble
New Jersey Real Estate Bubble
Design
Design Public
NY Times House & Home
Green
Alternative Fuel Watch
TreeHugger
Green Links
Real Estate
Apartment Therapy
Curbed
Inman News
MSNBC Real Estate
NY Times Real Estate
Mortgage & Finance
Bankrate Blog
CNN Money
Other
AskMetaFilter
Getting Things Done


Powered by
Movable Type 3.2

Wednesday Housing News


Found via Inman: Tomorrow's Cities, Tomorrow's Suburbs. This completely squares with the rise of "New Urbanism" that is bewitching urban planners, architects, developers, and of course, flippers.

But what the flip market lacks is a real sense of building a community worth living in. Anyone can slap a coat of paint and knock down a few walls in an apartment building, then call it a condo--hell, Washington, D.C. has raised that to an art form! But what happens when you get there? Does your pad have all the necessary amenities? Are there good schools nearby for the kids? How's the commute? Are the walls thick enough to block out your hot neighbors going at it on a Sunday morning? :)

Also thanks to Inman, I found the latest salvo from NAR on why banks shouldn't get into real estate. Of course, this all seems like a giant case of hair-splitting, since you don't get money for home loans from Joe's Chicken shack, so banks are already up to their toupees in the business as it is.

And indeed--banks are already getting deeper into the game just by pushing borrowers to refinance to fixed loans, if only to avoid a tsunami of foreclosures. Hell, BB&T threw down the gauntlet and said that it wouldn't lend to developers using Kelo as a justification for eminent domain seizure. If that's not political, or a market move, what is, really?

I'm certainly not a fan of banks possessing even more power than they do, but I think the real fear of the real estate industry is that if banks can make RE deals, that means they don't need third parties to do the work for them. Tough break for the commission-based, sales-focused, close or bust folks, eh?

Posted at February 1, 2006 02:44 PM

digg this story

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://weblog.housing.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/111


Go back