CATEGORIES

ARCHIVES

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

October 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005


XML FEEDS

Atom

RSS

CONTACT

Send suggestions to:

blog@housing.com

RSS Feed
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to MyMSN
Subscribe at NewsGator Online

Links

Architecture
Archinect
FabPreFab
Land + Living

Bubble Blogs
Marin Real Estate Bubble Blog
The Housing Bubble Blog
Bubble Meter
The Boy In The Housing Bubble
New Jersey Real Estate Bubble
Design
Design Public
NY Times House & Home
Green
Alternative Fuel Watch
TreeHugger
Green Links
Real Estate
Apartment Therapy
Curbed
Inman News
MSNBC Real Estate
NY Times Real Estate
Mortgage & Finance
Bankrate Blog
CNN Money
Other
AskMetaFilter
Getting Things Done


Powered by
Movable Type 3.2

Housing Bubble: Crunching the Numbers


Business Week gives us a view of the Fed's rate-tightening moves and what that can mean for housing. The "Conflicting signals" paragraph is of particular interest to me:

There has been a drop in the median new home price over the last three months, which may be more meaningful. The weakness that we're seeing seems concentrated in high-end homes -- which we had expected in a period of rising interest rates. Mortgage rates are rising, so it's expensive to trade up. But with rates still far below their historical average, first-time homebuyers continue trying to get in before they rise further. The result is a shift in the mix of home sales toward smaller homes.

What's that about mixed messages? And the shift towards the trend towards smaller houses?

What's probably going to end up happening is that buyers who continually push for larger homes will find themselves dangerously overextended, particularly if they're first-time buyers, and even more so if they're using "creative loans" to get in on the house in question. Although I'm generally disdainful of the phrase "living within one's means," this is one situation where it applies. Does a family of three or four need a house that can comfortably seat seven or eight? :)

One of my trusted sources clued me in to a case of a large banking concern's mortgage subsidiary getting customer data lost. Even though they claim it's been found and untampered, I'd sure as hell be hesitant about dealing with these guys again. And note that this news isn't anywhere on their front page, like it should be. Granted, if I worked for this company, I'd be embarrassed about that, but there's such a thing as "sucking it up." Identity theft is a serious concern of everyone, and mortgage applications are a key way to provide enterprising thieves with all the info they need to make your life a living hell.

Disclaimer: Mortgage.com and Housing.com? Not related. That's probably obvious, but it never hurts to restate it.

Posted at December 20, 2005 03:54 PM

digg this story

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://weblog.housing.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/86


Go back