CATEGORIES

ARCHIVES

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

October 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005


XML FEEDS

Atom

RSS

CONTACT

Send suggestions to:

blog@housing.com

RSS Feed
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to MyMSN
Subscribe at NewsGator Online

Links

Architecture
Archinect
FabPreFab
Land + Living

Bubble Blogs
Marin Real Estate Bubble Blog
The Housing Bubble Blog
Bubble Meter
The Boy In The Housing Bubble
New Jersey Real Estate Bubble
Design
Design Public
NY Times House & Home
Green
Alternative Fuel Watch
TreeHugger
Green Links
Real Estate
Apartment Therapy
Curbed
Inman News
MSNBC Real Estate
NY Times Real Estate
Mortgage & Finance
Bankrate Blog
CNN Money
Other
AskMetaFilter
Getting Things Done


Powered by
Movable Type 3.2

Friday Housing News


There's a good deal of economic uncertainty in the air today, as evinced by rising jobless claims and sluggish wage increases. We're definitely moving towards a model of growth through passive income--dividends, investments, and of course, home equity. That's the prime mover behind the economy's strength, and why the bubble watchers are dancing like angels on the head of a pin every time mortgage data gets released.

Ben Bernanke does seem to be aware of this, according to his comments to Jim Bunning, the one guy to ixnay Bernanke's nomination to succeed Greenspan as Big Giant Fed Head. I'm a little concerned that he's focusing on reforming Fannie and Freddie. Granted, they need it, but it seems to be too much in line with the Bush regime's policy of leaving housing to the whims of the market as much as possible. That kind of thinking is what inflated housing prices in the first place.

The folks over at Patrick.net are speculating--some tongue-in-cheek, some not--on the economic consequences of a bailout. Money quote:

3. Do you think the government should institute a special renter’s tax to use towards the bailouts?

If you’re not a homeowner by now with all the incentives and easy money, then you’re just not a Patriot and deserve whatever’s coming to you.

I want this thing to be as regressive as possible –the greater the % of HH income you spend on rent, the greater your tax should be. Same thing goes for unrepentent savers. If you have ton$ of money just sitting idle in CDs, money market or savings accounts, you’re practically asking to have the government take it away from you!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, DIE RENTERS, DIE!!!!!!

Heh. You just know some wonk over at the Fed was thinking of this very idea, only without the snark. ;)

To give you some perspective, here's a look at how bad things are getting for Wilma evacuees in Florida. It's not enough that Katrina and Rita's fallout is disappearing from the radar, but the media seems to be completely burying the devastation from Wilma. One million people without power in a country with our resources...nothing to sneeze at, kiddies.

At least FEMA has decided not to be turkeys about housing evacuees over Thanksigving, though they're clearly still Grinches for Christmas. Stop me if this whole "extending deadline" thing sounds a tad familiar.

And on that recursive note, I bid you all a HAPPY THANKSGIVING!!!!!!!

Posted at November 23, 2005 08:35 PM

digg this story

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://weblog.housing.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/74


Go back