CATEGORIES

ARCHIVES

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

October 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005


XML FEEDS

Atom

RSS

CONTACT

Send suggestions to:

blog@housing.com

RSS Feed
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to MyMSN
Subscribe at NewsGator Online

Links

Architecture
Archinect
FabPreFab
Land + Living

Bubble Blogs
Marin Real Estate Bubble Blog
The Housing Bubble Blog
Bubble Meter
The Boy In The Housing Bubble
New Jersey Real Estate Bubble
Design
Design Public
NY Times House & Home
Green
Alternative Fuel Watch
TreeHugger
Green Links
Real Estate
Apartment Therapy
Curbed
Inman News
MSNBC Real Estate
NY Times Real Estate
Mortgage & Finance
Bankrate Blog
CNN Money
Other
AskMetaFilter
Getting Things Done


Powered by
Movable Type 3.2

Which real estate lender Web sites are worth shopping?


(This is Part 2 of a three-part series.) By Jack Guttentag, Professor of Finance Emeritus at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

Read Part 1 of 2

Borrowers who shop for a mortgage online, for any of the reasons I discussed last week, should only spend time on sites that price their loan. If a site doesn't price the type of loan you want, with the features you require, don't bother with it. You are online to shop, not to be seduced into making a phone call.

To help, I recently scored 21 sites for the depth and comprehensiveness of the information provided to shoppers. Of these, I considered 17 worth listing on my Web site because they had some price functionality and showed all settlement costs.

The Best: The highest-ranked site was www.E-LOAN, followed closely by www.mortgage.com (the site of ABN AMRO), and www.indymac.com.

E-LOAN is the only site that meets all my requirements for the designation of Upfront Mortgage Lender (UML). Among other things, UMLs provide a summary of all the market niches priced by the site, and disclose all the major features of their adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs). The two runners-up did neither, but they did cover many loan types and market niches.

A site with a higher score is one that prices a larger number of potential transactions, and provides shoppers with the information needed to make decisions. Here are some examples of the scoring system I used:

Mortgage Types and Features: For every program they price beyond 15- and 30-year fixed-rate conventional loans, a site receives 1 point. This includes different types of ARMs, balloon loans and FHA/VA loans. They also receive a point for disclosing each important ARM feature.

Down Payment: A site that allows the user to enter the down payment receives 2 points, and an additional point if the down payment can be less than 5 percent. If the site uses one down payment in all its pricing but tells the user what that assumption is, it receives 1 point.

Settlement Costs: A site that shows all settlement costs receives 1 point, another point if lender fees are segregated, another point if lender fees are guaranteed, another point if the guarantee includes the appraisal, another point if the guarantee includes the credit report, and 2 additional points if it covers all third-party fees.

Points: A site receives 1 point if some of the mortgages are priced with multiple combinations of interest rate and points, an additional point if rates are shown for negative points (rebates), and a point if it prices no-cost loans.

Strengths in Coverage: 10 of the 17 listed sites priced loans on second homes, loans on investment properties, and cash-out refinances. Most sites also priced loans on 2-, 3- and 4-unit properties, as well as on condos. There were even five sites that priced loans on co-ops, and three that priced loans on manufactured homes.

Fourteen of 17 sites priced loans with down payments specified by the shopper (rather than assumed by the site), and in eight cases down payments could be less than 5 percent. Most of the eight allowed zero down on at least some transactions.

Sixteen of 17 sites provided different combinations of interest rate and points on at least some programs, and 12 included negative points (rebates).

All 17 sites showed total settlement costs, 10 segregated lender fees, and eight explicitly guaranteed lender fees.

Weaknesses in Coverage: While shoppers can find every type of ARM offered on multiple sites, only E-LOAN and Chase Mortgage (ranked number 5) disclose the index and its current value, the margin, and all rate caps. If you price an ARM on any other site and need this information to make an intelligent decision, you will have to contact them to fill in the blanks.

Except for E-LOAN and Indy Mac, the sites assume your credit is excellent. E-LOAN and IndyMac adjust price for a credit score entered by the user, but the adjustments are quite crude. Shoppers with scores below 620 cannot yet shop effectively online.

Online shoppers also do best if they can fully document their income and assets. Only four sites have a "stated income" option, and none offer "no docs."

Why Show Lower-Ranked Sites? I show detailed information on 17 sites because, while a lower-ranked site has less coverage, there is always the possibility that it prices your loan and a higher-ranked site does not. Countrywide.com, for example, ranked number 10 overall, but it is the only site that prices FHA and VA loans.

Here is the complete list by score: E-LOAN.com (46), Mortgage.com (42), Indymac.com (37), Greenpointmortgage.com (32), Chasehomefinance.com (30), Mortgage.etrade.com (29), Charteronedirect.com (29), Wamuhomeloans.com (26), Bankofamerica.com (25), Countrywide.com (25), Citimortgage.com (24), Ditech.com (20), Wachovia.com (19), GMACmortgage.com (14), Homeloancenter.com (14), Infoloan.com (12), INGdirect.com (12).

Posted at October 9, 2005 11:10 PM

digg this story


Go back