CATEGORIES

ARCHIVES

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

October 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005


XML FEEDS

Atom

RSS

CONTACT

Send suggestions to:

blog@housing.com

RSS Feed
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to MyMSN
Subscribe at NewsGator Online

Links

Architecture
Archinect
FabPreFab
Land + Living

Bubble Blogs
Marin Real Estate Bubble Blog
The Housing Bubble Blog
Bubble Meter
The Boy In The Housing Bubble
New Jersey Real Estate Bubble
Design
Design Public
NY Times House & Home
Green
Alternative Fuel Watch
TreeHugger
Green Links
Real Estate
Apartment Therapy
Curbed
Inman News
MSNBC Real Estate
NY Times Real Estate
Mortgage & Finance
Bankrate Blog
CNN Money
Other
AskMetaFilter
Getting Things Done


Powered by
Movable Type 3.2

Exit Wounds


Found via Patrick.net: GotExit?

This is hilarious. It's like those "tax repair" companies that promise to settle your IRS problems for pennies on the dollar, or debt consolidator fly-by-nights. The objective here is to try and convince a home owner why it's a good idea to sell, to pay these yo-yos to show them how.

This paragraph is one for the books:

You like the idea of selling, but HATE the idea of paying Uncle Sam significant taxes.

You are wondering if it ever a good idea to pay taxes? And what are the options for deferring, spreading, or even eliminating taxes?

The lack of punctuation just makes it. I'm sure we all would rather not be paying taxes, but I'd love to see the look on the faces of the people who buy into this crap when the IRS comes calling.

This is a fairly amusing symptom of a more serious problem...when the market was first beginning its incredible boom, there were tons of people who could slap a sign on the door and say they were "realtors," "appraisers," and "brokers." Now that the market is leveling off, these same people are trying to tell you how to get out of the situation they helped get you in.

Needless to say, do not listen.

Forbes has a breakdown of America's most expensive rental markets. The results aren't as predictable as you might think.

Unsurprisingly, New York tops the list with a whopping $26.04 per square foot paid for the top-flight apartments. But San Francisco, widely cited as the barometer for the housing craze at times, is nudged out of the top three by Boston and Honolulu. This is due to the extreme premium on available land for development, no doubt. Not much room to grow on the islands.

Most of the top 10 is taken up by areas surrounding New York, like Northern New Jersey and Stamford, Connecticut. "A rising tide lifts all boats," it is said, and prices are no exception.

Interestingly, the Washington, D.C.-area market (which, in this poll's view, apparently includes Baltimore and most of West Virginia) doesn't even crack the top 10 as far as rent goes. I guess the $1600-$2000 for a 1-bedroom, 900 square-footer I've seen is not the worst it can get.

Posted at September 22, 2005 05:29 PM

digg this story

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://weblog.housing.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/34


Go back